Saturday, September 11, 2010

Questions and Skepticism

Before I get into this next post I have to thank Dr. Ross McKitrick for suggesting that I start this blog in the first place. It is the book that he co-authored Taken By Storm that first peaked my interest in the issue of Global Warming, and climate science.

For the foreward of this book Ross and fellow author Christopher Essex went to renowned scientist Sir Mortimer Long-Bore for a "denunciation" of their book which he was happy to do. He criticized the book having "independent thinking and [a] skeptical attitude." He questions the qualifications of the authors to speak on the issue since Ross is a professor of Economics who studies environmental policy; and Christopher a professor of Applied Mathematics. He instead calls on people to read "qualified experts" such as Al Gore. Al Gore? I see because a degree in Government, and Journalism does qualify one to be an expert? He finishes his comment by saying of the book and its authors "I have not read it, and you should not either; indeed, I threw my copy on the fire. I only regret that burning the book was my only remedy. In a better age I would have burned the authors as with it." It is this type of ignorant bullying that has controlled the "debate" on global warming. Skeptics, and deniers are called stupid; paid for by special interest, and in some cases are said to be worthy of burning like we are living in Salem.

Now it was the purchase of another book last night and reading the epigraph and preface that caused me to sit down and type this post. The book is Climate of Extremes. One of the authors, Patrick J. Michaels was the State Climatologist for the Commonwealth of Virginia, he left the University of Virginia and the State Department of Environmental Science after being told by the Governor of Virginia that he was not to speak as State Climatologist about Global Warming. As is pointed out his situation is not unique. The authors do not say that man-made global warming does not exist. They question its severity, and that there may be some positive effects.

The authors point to an example of alarmism perpetrated by one Al Gore. In 2007 while on Larry King Live when asked by a caller "what issues caused by climate change globally are likely to affect the United States security in the next 10 years," Gore responded by saying that "You know even a one-meter increase, even a three-foot increase in in sea level would cause tens of millions of climate refugees." Now this is a baseless claim. Nothing more. The authors of the book point out that the "best estimate published by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in 2007, for the next 10 years, ranges between 0.8 and 1.7 inches."

It is this rampant alarmism that has in my opinion undermined and bastardized the issue. One should be free to question opinions that are expressed, and call out those that make absurd claims without being pilloried by people that one might well assume are fearful of dissent.

1 comment:

  1. My fight against censorship in all its forms goes on. I love the part about "in a better time i would have been allowed to burn the authors with it". I have personally found lately that liberal "tolerance" is starting to get rather extreme. This idea of eliminating opposing thought to gain consensus is scary.

    ReplyDelete